We can imagine an audio file as glass with water. So there are no exact figures, that define the best audio converter.Īs rule, a proper blind hearing test can give a more exact answer to the question. In audio, a character of distortions can impact sound. If you look for sound quality, you need a converter that provides minimal distortions. Which music converter is the best? It depends on what you want primarily. And a powerful computer doesn't need when playback in the bit-perfect mode of an audio player (case 1). When we talk about digital music, case 2 requires many computing resources.Ī proper converter can do it offline with high quality. We can imagine a music player as a conveyor belt between a kitchen (audio file) and a dinning room ( DAC and speakers).Ĭase 1: If the belt just delivers a soup (digital music from the audio file) from the kitchen to the dining room, it means "no processing" or "bit-perfect" playback.Ĭase 2: If, on the belt (player), the soup (digital music) gets additional cooking,Īnd we have other soup (other audio resolution) in the dinning room (DAC and speakers). To fix the issue True Gapless technology is used. It can cause artifacts at borders after resampling and other processing. They have non-zero levels at track borders. Some albums are uninterrupted (operas, live concerts). Optionally, for 24-bit and more output, a converter can allow applying of differing to 16-bit input. And, lesser speed is higher sound quality. Processing distortions may be audible or visible after analysis.Īs rule, speed of conversion defines sound quality. In case #2 (resampling, lossy compressing, bit depth altering, etc.) a converter defines sound quality. But re-encoding of lossy files adds losses in the splitting. When lossless files (FLAC, WAV, etc.) are splitted, re-encoding doesn't cause quality losses. CUE-splitting with re-encoding can solve this issue. It causes re-placement of part of one track's content to neighbor song. And track border may be moved into a frame. As rule, the compressed files are divided by frames. When CUE with compressed file is splitted, the splitting may be provided without re-encoding. If we get real sound difference, another reason is there, probably. There is functionality difference is possible. In case #1, it does not matter that converter is used. It is a lossless format repacking without audio processing (altering resolution audio, in instance).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |